Trade War rumors may be more than just Gossip!

The US appears to want to wage a trade war with the rest of the world. Although some countries are retaliating, we don’t expect most countries to drag themselves down the protective route. While global trade maybe damaged, the knock-on impact on global economic growth is likely to be small. Thus, aggregate global demand for commodities is unlikely to fall because of the preferential policies from the US. Rather, supply chains are likely to be severely disrupted and prices of the commodities are likely to rise because of their increasing scarcity in destination markets.

US issues bilateral tariffs

In March 2018 the US announced it will place tariffs on $50 billion of Chinese imports, and shortly afterwards declared a world-wide tariff on steel and aluminum imports under the guise of national security concerns. The US has launched a national security investigation into car and truck imports that could lead to the application of similar tariffs on autos. The initial knee-jerk reaction from commodity markets were for prices to decline. But upon assessment, the likely disruption to supply chains drove prices higher.

Key

  1. US tariffs on solar panels and washing machines
  2. Aluminum and steel tariffs announced
  3. Temporary suspension of steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada, Mexico, EU
  4. China announced tariffs on US goods including pork
  5. US published list of Chinese goods that will have tariffs
  6. China announced tariffs on additional US goods including soy beans
  7. China cancels all soybean orders
  8. US launches investigation into car imports
  9. Temporary suspension of steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada, Mexico, EU expires
  10. Canada announces list of retaliatory tariffs against US
  11. EU announces list of retaliatory tariffs against US
  12. US releases list of Chinese goods that will face a tariff starting July 6th

When the tariffs on China were confirmed in June (it took some time to detail which goods would be affected), prices fell again. We believe that commodity prices are going through the same motions they did in March.

Sentiment is driving price rather than the fundamentals. For a fairly contained economic growth impact, the disruption to supply chains is far greater. Just as we experienced in April, a bounce-back in prices is inevitable at this stage of the game.

Economic impact

For illustration, we looked at some scenarios generated by Bloomberg. In these scenarios, rather than detailing specific micro bilateral tariffs, it is assumed that the US applies a 10% tariff on all imports across all countries and other countries retaliate with reciprocal tariffs. While the cumulative decline in global trade by 2021 would be more than 7% from a base case scenario (of no tariffs), the cumulative decline in world GDP would be less than 1% over that period. To be clear, the policies announced so far do not come close to a 10% across-the-board tariff. The impact of policies announced so far comes close to zero.

Even the impact on China’s GDP, which is the target for a large part of US’s policy, is likely to be less than a cumulative 1% by 2021 even with a more punitive tariff of 45%.

Supply chains

Bearing in mind that the damage to global economic output is likely to be small, let’s turn to supply chains. The US is highly reliant on imports of many base metals. Manufacturing companies in the US will either have to pay more for imports or find domestic sources of the metals. Take aluminum for example: while the headline figures look like US only utilizes 37% of its aluminum production capacity (so theoretically it could ramp up production), the country does not have any bauxite mines (the key ingredient for aluminum manufacturing) and imports almost all of it. Countries who want to retaliate can easily identify this Achilles heel.

While it is beyond the scope of this blog to analyses all supply chains, we believe there will be many traded commodities that are likely to face supply disruptions. Hence, we believe that most metal prices are likely to rise.

Agricultural commodities

While we are price optimistic on metals, we are pessimistic on many agricultural commodities (at least those traded on US exchanges). One source of retaliation on the US is via tariffs on agricultural exports. The impact of that is greater cost or scarcity in importing countries like China or Mexico, but that could prove to be price negative for the US where most of the liquid international futures contracts exist. We have already seen price divergence between Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and Dalian exchange prices.

Conclusion

We believe that for internationally traded futures contracts in metals, the price impact of the escalating trade war will be positive as disruptions to supply chains outweigh the negative economic growth effect. Given that the US is a big exporter of agriculture and the large, international liquid futures contracts are based in the US, the retaliatory impact of trade wars is likely to be price negative for agriculture. We understand that the times we’re living in are more complex than ever. Call one of our Account Representatives now so that we can help make life simple like the good Ole’ days.